mixed media daily, Year 2: 31 december 2011

Saturday, December 31, 2011

31 december 2011

That's it. Happy New Year's Eve, internet! A proper postscript is coming very soon in 2012.

11 comments:

AnonymousDecember 31, 2011 at 9:12 PM
Congratulations, Erik! Amazing. Happy New Year! NAIL
ReplyDelete
Replies
Erik ShveimaDecember 31, 2011 at 10:32 PM
thanks, NAIL! and a happy new year to you too!
ReplyDelete
Replies
Uncle AnthonyJanuary 1, 2012 at 3:56 AM
You have done a great job ERIK!ALL the best in the new year.We will miss your Art and keen observations of the world we all live in.
ReplyDelete
Replies
TobyJanuary 1, 2012 at 4:22 PM
Belated congratulations!
ReplyDelete
Replies
MbeckJanuary 1, 2012 at 5:17 PM
Congratulations and very well done, Erik.
ReplyDelete
Replies
Erik ShveimaJanuary 2, 2012 at 3:11 PM
Thanks guys!
ReplyDelete
Replies
AdeleJanuary 3, 2012 at 9:19 AM
Sorry to see you sign off but thanks for a great year. Happy 2012 to you Mia and Astrid!
Adele
ReplyDelete
Replies
Vicky YounJanuary 3, 2012 at 2:44 PM
Happy New Year! and congrats on completing your mission of 2011. What a great job! When can I buy a book of this project on amazon.com :P
ReplyDelete
Replies
Erik ShveimaJanuary 4, 2012 at 10:09 AM
Thanks, Adele and Vicky. A book? I'll see what I can do about that.
ReplyDelete
Replies
Michael MastersonJanuary 4, 2012 at 4:19 PM
Wow! What an impressive oeuvre. I haven't always commented on these, but have enjoying dipping into them, especially when I've been out of town and haven't seen The Times. Bravo!
ReplyDelete
Replies
Sean Z.January 5, 2012 at 4:49 AM
Erik, we are so proud of you and thank you for sharing your view each and every day throughout this past year! Wishing Mia, Astrid and you a very healthy and prosperous 2012!

Yours truly,
Sean & Kelly
ReplyDelete
Replies

extra extra

Well, hello. I’m a little surprised we’re all meeting up again like this. I’m more than a little surprised to be launching a project called “Mixed Media Daily, Year Two.” And, to be honest, I’m a little disappointed that the subtitle isn’t “Electric Boogaloo.” But I’ll get over that.

You know what I won’t get over? The way 2016 came to a close. Like the darkness around a sputtering campfire. Like a venus flytrap around a hapless fly.

Back in 2011, when I did the first round of Mixed Media Daily, I thought of the project as an experiment in portraiture, an homage to a style of media that was slowly slipping out of daily life and into the history books. In some sense it felt a like an early obit; I imagined that the death of any newspaper would occur only when they actually (forgive the hackneyed phrase) stopped the presses. Simpler times!

The Los Angeles Times, and newspapers in general, I’m happy to report, are still alive. What seems to have kicked the bucket is the desire of a not inconsequential number of Americans to digest hard news, to do the minimal mental work required to be able to call oneself an informed voter. Which may be the same thing as the death of the newspaper industry, but with one hell of a twist.

How did we get here? How did so many of our fellow citizens mutate into a pack of political rageaholics who rely exclusively on easily debunked garbage journalism to justify their vote? Who have such a white-hot mistrust of mainstream media that they’ll happily believe anything thrown up on the web by any random, anonymous domestic or international opportunist over a well-researched piece from a credible news source? There’s no simple way to unpack this sad, confounding turn of events. Some things we know are worth considering: Since the election many journalists have written about the profusion of fake news outlets, sites set up to turn a quick profit by playing to the latent (or overt) biases of their readership. Traditional news outlets---cable and network television, and of course, print media---also received a measure of blame for what some saw as their unfair equivocation of two clearly unequal candidates. More recently, post apocalypse---sorry, I mean post election---there have been reports of conservative politicians appropriating the term “fake news” to describe stories published by legitimate news sources that do not jibe with their agendas. It all adds up to a campaign of misinformation (hi, Putin!) that is designed to erode our democracy. That, fellow citizens, is unacceptable.

The saddest thing might be that the truth was out there, and easily accessible. I read plenty of well-written, well-researched stories that laid out the truly damning details of our shifty President-Elect’s shifty behavior in his business and his personal life. After reading each piece, I would think, should the country be crazy enough to elect this clown, they cannot say that they weren’t warned. And then the country went ahead and elected this clown.

So here we are. Our country is in serious crisis mode, but I’m not ready to give up on it. We need every weapon primed and ready for the coming four-year bar brawl. One of those weapons will most certainly be solid investigative journalism (Woodward and Bernstein, anyone?). Of course as much as we need good journalism, good journalism needs our attention. So I’m going to pay attention. Close attention, and with a critical eye. And since I’m going to be processing a lot of what will undoubtedly be fucked-up news, I’ll run it all through the old illustration filter, so it least it’ll be kind of fun to look at, and maybe I’ll be able to keep my blood below boiling point.

All of this adds up to a very different mission from the one I used to launch this project six years ago. The main focus will still be the Los Angeles Times, but in an effort to doodle a broader consensus of opinion, I’ll occasionally be working from other local papers (we publish a lot of daily papers here in the Golden State). If I go out of town, there might be an even farther-flung guest paper in the mix. That’s the plan for now. It’s sort of a loose plan, but we’re all just winging it at this point, aren’t we? We’re all stuck in the upside-down, where clowns become kings, homes become battlegrounds, and pens become swords. It’s a scary place, to be sure. Let’s not let it scare us into submission.

Saturday, December 31, 2011

31 december 2011

11 comments:

Contributors